NESARA Legal Proceedings Continue

Wednesday, June 23, 2004

June 23, 2004 11:21 p.m. PDT

Hello Dear Friends and White Knights,

In the last few weeks, I've learned there are not just eight betrayers who must be removed from their positions related to NESARA, there are over thirty people who have involvement with the NESARA announcement process who must be removed. Those who have already prepared to sabotage NESARA's announcement go beyond the Committee in charge of NESARA's announcement. Others who need to be removed include some of the NESARA announcement presenters as well as numerous of the military officers who command the military units doing NESARA announcement security duty.

The key issue is that in order to ensure ALL the betrayers are removed, there must be air-tight evidence provided against all these people during the "written phase" of the NESARA petition before World Court. The Court's rules require that "all evidence" be submitted PRIOR to the oral hearing phase as noted in the excerpt below from the Court's website information:

"Once the written proceedings are at an end, new documents can only be submitted in exceptional circumstances and provided this will not delay the proceedings. They must normally be filed in 125 copies. The Registrar thereupon communicates any such new documents to the other party, asking for its views thereon. If there is no objection, the Court will admit the new documents. Should there be an objection to them, the Court itself will decide the matter and will only accept a document "if it considers the document necessary"."

During the current "written phase" of the process, there must be overwhelming evidence submitted to the Court against each of the over 30 people who must be removed. It's absolutely critical that the evidence against each betrayer is so convincing that none of the betrayers can wiggle out of being removed. Among those who must be removed, are some of the US Supreme Court Justices who ruled in favor of Bush in the year 2000 election case, high level military officers, and other people highly respected in their professions. To find such high level people guilty of betraying NESARA, the evidence and witnesses will have to show beyond the shadow of a doubt that these people have been betraying NESARA.

At this time, there is not enough evidence submitted to the Court. The effort to obtain evidence against some of the over 30 betrayers is just beginning as these trouble-makers have only recently become known. More witnesses must be convinced to give evidence against the betrayers; this will take some time to accomplish. Since there is no guarantee that any additional evidence would be allowed after the end of the written phase, the additional evidence must be submitted to the World Court in support of the NESARA petition for the removal of the betrayers and the new NESARA announcement time period BEFORE the oral hearing can take place.

The hearing of the NESARA petition must wait until all the evidence has been submitted. It's likely it will be several weeks before all the evidence can be gathered and submitted to the Court.

None of us like having to wait longer for NESARA's announcement but, unless this court process is overwhelmingly successful, the betrayers will simply continue to sabotage NESARA for many more months and years. The decisive battle to remove these betrayers from being in charge of NESARA will take place in World Court; it is a battle WE must WIN for us to have any hope of NESARA being announced.

Below are excerpts of how the petition/pleading process is handled at the Court from the International Court of Justice's website. This information helps us to understand the complexities and intricacies of the legal process which must be successful to free NESARA from being controlled by the very people who are betraying NESARA, Americans, and the world.

I will continue to track and report as more witnesses are convinced to testify and more evidence is submitted. Let's continue to share the good news of NESARA with others in preparation for the next official NESARA announcement period which should be the time we do see NESARA announced! NESARA Now!

Blessings and Love,
Dove of Oneness
Worldwide NTAT Director

Dove uses a pseudonym for security and privacy reasons. NESARA stands for the National Economic Security And Reformation Act. The term "White Knights" is borrowed from the Wall Street Journal and the world of big business hostile takeovers when a vulnerable company is "rescued from a hostile takeover by a White Knight" corporation or wealthy person. Certainly, these people fighting to bring Americans and the world the benefits of NESARA and to rescue our people from government and banking fraud deserve to be called "White Knights". World Court is the International Court of Justice in the city called The Hague, in the Netherlands. This is NOT the International Criminal Court from which Bush Jr. removed the U.S. These are two totally different courts with different purposes.

http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/igeneralinformation/ibbook/Bbookframepage.htm

THE PROCEEDINGS

[Excerpts from Proceedings section of the International Court of Justice website.]

It is always some time after a dispute arises between the States concerned that it is submitted to the Court. This pre-Court phase, during which the States concerned discuss and consider the issue lasts on average five to six years, and sometimes over 10 years. Nevertheless, many disputes, which must of their very nature be extremely complex, since otherwise they would have been settled between the parties, have not yet been completely clarified when the dispute is brought before the Court, and the issues require lengthy study by the parties themselves throughout the course of the proceedings.

THE PROCEEDINGS ARE FIRST WRITTEN AND THEN ORAL

Combining the two types of procedure that are used to varying degrees in all countries, the Statute of the Court provides that proceedings before the Court shall be in two stages: a written stage and an oral stage. The Court has applied this general principle flexibly, enabling those parties that wish to do so to lay greater emphasis on either the written proceedings, as in the "Fisheries and Right of Passage over Indian Territory" cases, or the oral proceedings, as in the "Corfu Channel" and "South West Africa" cases. Whilst each of these phases of the proceedings has sometimes been subject to criticism, there has never been any agreement as to what might be eliminated. In fact, the combination of a written stage followed by an oral stage, as required by the Statute, is highly desirable if the Court is to reach its decision on a fully informed basis. It provides both the parties and the Court with the safeguards required for the sound administration of international justice.

WRITTEN PROCEEDINGS

The first or written stage of the proceedings involves the submission to the Court of pleadings containing a detailed statement of the points of fact and of law on which each party relies and an answer to any previous pleading of the other side. The parties are free in their choice of the form they give their pleadings. One of the reasons why cases tend to be very fully pleaded is the need to satisfy the Court as a whole and each of its Members individually, in other words, to satisfy 15 judges coming from different legal backgrounds. Supporting documents must normally be annexed, but if they are too lengthy, extracts only need be attached, and, unless it has already been published, a full text of the document deposited in the Registry, where it is available to Members of the Court and the other party for consultation. The Court may itself call for documents or explanations during the written proceedings ("Rights of Nationals of the United States of America in Morocco", "Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943").

The pleadings are confidential pending final judgment, the practice of arbitral tribunals being herein followed as conducive to an equable presentation of the issues. A signed original of each pleading is delivered by the agent to the Registrar, together with 126 copies for the use of the other party, Members of the Court and the Registry. Where they are printed, as is generally the case, pleadings must so far as possible conform to the format and typographical rules recommended by the Court, but, for reasons of economy and speed, since 1972 printing has no longer been compulsory. The pleadings and their annexes may be filed in either English or French, at the choice of the party concerned. They may be in a combination of these two languages and may even be wholly or partly in a third language, provided that a translation into English or French is attached. The Registry makes an unofficial translation into the other official language of the Court for the convenience of its Members.

In each of the pleadings it files, a party indicates its "submissions" (French: conclusions) at that stage of the case. These "submissions", a concept borrowed by international arbitral and judicial practice from the legal systems of Civil Law countries and one unknown in this form in Common Law countries, are a concise statement of what precisely the party in question is asking the Court to adjudge and declare on the basis of the facts it has alleged and the legal grounds it has adduced, in respect not only of the original claim but also of any counter-claim. In principle they do not include any recital, however brief, of the aforesaid facts and arguments. They define the scope of the claim and the framework within which the Court will have to reach its decision. As the Court once observed, it is its duty "not only to reply to the questions as stated in the final submissions of the parties, but also to abstain from deciding points not included in those submissions".

Matters of fact, which frequently are not in issue as between the parties, are in general proved by documentary evidence, such evidence normally forming part of the pleadings. Once the written proceedings are at an end, new documents can only be submitted in exceptional circumstances and provided this will not delay the proceedings. They must normally be filed in 125 copies. The Registrar thereupon communicates any such new documents to the other party, asking for its views thereon. If there is no objection, the Court will admit the new documents. Should there be an objection to them, the Court itself will decide the matter and will only accept a document "if it considers the document necessary". No reference may be made by the parties during the oral proceedings to the contents of any document which neither forms part of a readily available publication nor has been submitted to the Court in accordance with the above provisions.

In hearing witnesses or experts called by either of the parties, the Court has so far in general followed the procedure of Common Law countries, without holding itself necessarily bound by any particular rule: an examination-in-chief by the representatives of the party calling the witnesses, followed by a cross-examination by the representatives of the other party, a re-examination by the former and replies to any question put by the President or Members of the Court. Under the same conditions as apply to oral argument by the representatives of the parties, evidence may be given in a language other than English or French.

For more information on NESARA, go to www.nesara.us