Hello Dear Friends,

Several of you have written about with questions about deliveries to Mail Box Etc. or PO Boxes, what to do if the person receiving is deceased, signing for deliveries, using the Non Assumpsit clause, and other questions. Here are some answers based on my research.

I called our local Mail Box Etc. today and they said that if a delivery comes in via Fed Ex, UPS, or US Postal Service for which the person receiving (ADDRESSEE) must be physically present to sign and show picture I.D. (this is called a "RESTRICTED delivery"), the Mail Box Etc. staff will put an "attempted delivery notice" in the person's mail box. The "Attempted Delivery Notice" will tell the person what to do to obtain their delivery. Attempted Delivery Notices have an 800# for us to call and find out where we need to go to pick up our delivery or some other instruction about WHERE and how to obtain the delivery.

I called my own mailbox service also and learned that the rules about "restricted deliveries" had changed in 2000. I was assured that there would DEFINITELY be an Attempted Delivery Notification put in my mailbox if the staff were unable to sign for a delivery on my behalf. If you have further questions, check with your own mail box service.

Regarding PO boxes at the U.S. Postal Service offices, the Post Offices were ordered months ago to provide "physical location addresses" for all members of the prosperity programs who have PO box addresses. It's important that your PHYSICAL location information is correct with the Post Office so that they can bring the delivery directly to your door. If your physical location info is INCORRECT, they will try to find you another way, for example, checking Social Security taxes records and this may delay your delivery a week or more. If they are unable to find you, they will finally leave an Attempted Delivery Notice in your PO Box, I'm told.

From what I'm hearing, it sounds UNLIKELY that other people will be able to sign for someone else's delivery. For those who gifted others into the programs using their own address, there may be special arrangements or processes to get the envelopes to those gifted in. I lack specific details on this. However, I'm sure this situation has come up before and that there is a solution already prepared.

Regarding people who are deceased and whether there are survivorship rights, I'm told that it depends on how the contract for each prosperity program was written whether there are survivorship rights. Thus far, I've been unable to find anyone who had a delivery to a deceased person and how that was handled.

There's a lot of discussion about "signing" things. Some of these things come from David Wynn Miller who has been developing ways for people to safeguard themselves in the CURRENT statutory law environment. Putting a hyphen and colon in one's name is part of David Wynn Miller's processes. I understand he has other processes as well – something about some kind of protection when you sign a check. It is my understanding that ALL of these extraordinary measures are to provide protection in a STATUTORY law environment. However, as soon as NESARA is announced, we are returned to CONSTITUTIONAL law and that, in my OPINION, makes all of David Wynn Miller's extraordinary measures UNNECESSARY. I have checked this with a few people but since ZERO person under 68 was alive the last time the U.S. was under full Constitutional Law, few people can speak from experience about living as an adult under full Constitutional Law. My understanding is that Constitutional Law is based on "common law" and that there is much LESS need for these kinds of extraordinary measures in the Constitutional Law environment because it's much more simple and direct.

There's also been a tremendous amount of discussion about how to "sign" the Non Disclosure and use the Non Assumpsit clause. I will be signing mine as: "My Name and/or assigns" and I will be signing in cursive "script" using my usual signature. Regarding the Non Assumpsit clause, I checked with someone who had been advised by a Constitutional lawyer on the use of the Non Assumpsit clause. The Constitutional lawyer said that in common law, upon which Constitutional law is based, only "printing" of the words is valid. And the "printing" needs to be in lower case except where capitals are used for proper nouns or to begin sentences. The following quote of the Non Assumpsit clause shows the proper use of upper and lower case letters:

"Non Assumpsit without prejudice reserving all natural God-given inalienable birthrights waiving none ever."

OR

"Non Assumpsit without prejudice reserving all natural God-given unalienable birthrights waiving none ever."

(The second option has the spelling with "u" as first letter of "unalienable" as it is in my copy of Declaration of Independence and as it is spelled on the NESARA website.)

My research also indicates that it is okay to use a stamp to insert the clause on documents as long as you stamp all copies and use blue ink which shows it is something you added to the document. Whether we hand print the Non Assumpsit or stamp it, it must appear IMMEDIATELY ABOVE our signature to be valid.

I'm including the definitions of the terms in the Non Assumpsit below. Also, my copy of the Declaration of Independence shows that the founding fathers used the spelling "unalienable" and this is obviously why the NESARA website uses this spelling.

One last point: my information indicates that we in the U.S. are ahead of all the other countries with our government and banking changes. We have nearly finished all our government and banking changes and the rest of the world is seems to have further to go on theirs. All major countries will be making monetary and banking changes to implement their own precious metals-backed new currency and banking systems this coming year. I feel that once we have the corrupt D.C. government and other corrupt people out of power, the U.S. will be a very secure country and things will go very well here. Unless I am part of the one-third being instructed to put some of my gold certificates in offshore banks, I intend to enjoy the improvements in our country and wait awhile to let the dust settle in other countries before I go abroad.

I'm very confident that the White Knights have MANY monitoring processes in place to make sure the U.S. bankers conduct their business honestly. There are White Knight personnel INSIDE major bank branches to MAKE SURE the bankers handle our funding correctly. There are constant monitoring processes and audits planned.

Each of us should contract for a reputable auditing firm to do independent audits of our accounts at least quarterly as added assurance the bankers operate honestly. If we have offshore bank accounts, we should also have those audited independently by audit firms UNconnected to bankers.

The key is to become informed about the NEW legal, government, banking, and monetary systems in our country and our world. I'm told most things will be fully covered in the mainstream media after the NESARA announcement. Once we understand the new rules, we can proceed confidently. I think our biggest challenge will be avoiding scam artists and scam artists are everywhere. It's time to tune up our discernment abilities.

Blessings and Love,
Dove of Oneness

Non Assumpsit Definitions
Below are each of the phrases that might be unfamiliar to us and their meanings from Black's Law Dictionary:

Non Assumpsit (Not Assumptive):
[Latin "he did not undertake'] A general denial in an action of assumpsit. "Non assumpsit" is the general issue in assumpsit, whether special or general, and is in effect a formal denial of liability on the promise or contract alleged. …. Page 1073

Without prejudice:
Adv. Without loss of any rights; in a way that does not harm or cancel the legal rights or privileges of a party. Page 1596

Inalienable right: A right that cannot be transferred or surrendered; esp. a natural right such as the right to own property. Page 1323

Waive, verb. 1. To abandon, renounce, or surrender (a claim, privilege, right etc.); to give up (a right or claim) voluntarily. Page 1574

I also looked up UNalienable in Black's because they use this spelling in NESARA. Basically, Black's Law Dictionary indicates that it means the same thing as INalienable.

Unalienable, adjective. See Inalienable. Page 1525

My understanding is that the Non Assumpsit clause is used as a prevention from being bound by any implied or hidden conditions. I've always wanted to have the exact legal meanings of all these terms and thought some of you might also like to have this information.